Saturday, 16 March 2013

The Epic of Gilgamesh.. A review


Few months back, I got the chance of reading the EPIC OF GILGAMESH...and extracted some interesting facts from it...so here goes...

Brief account of the Epic of Gilgamesh
Gilgamesh was an oppressive ruler of the Sumerians, whose people called to the gods to send an archenemy. Enkidu, the uncivilized demigod, was sent for it. The king sent a harlot to “civilize” the savage enemy. Later, the enemies became friends and went out on many adventures. They enraged the gods and Enkidu got killed. Gilgamesh now feared death. Searching for immortality, he met Utnapishtim, the immortal man, who rescued from the global flood. Gilgamesh asked for immortality but could not attain it. In the end, he dreams of Enkidu who tells him about the world of the dead.

Linking the “Gilgamesh” and the “Genesis”




The epic of “Gilgamesh” is an extraordinary piece of literature. Its characters, incidents, different events related to divine beings; all


are appealing and compel the reader to continue till the end. This epic has strong (factual or superficial) connections with some classic ancient happenings and the hidden meanings rooted within the Biblical statements. It is also hypothesized that the manuscripts of the Babylonian epic of Gilgamesh were quite similar to the Biblical records in Hebrew; so it could be possible that they had a somewhat common origin (Alexander Heidel. The University Of Chicago Press, Chicago & London).A theory even states that the Epic of Gilgamesh was written in about 2000 B.C., while the incident of the flood of Genesis was recorded in 400 B.C.; pointing towards the fact that Bible got records of some events from the Babylonian account. Below are two of the most pondered upon Biblical incidents, comparing them with the Babylonian writings.

A. Comparison of “Enkidu’s civilizing” and “the sin of Adam and Eve”:

The epic of “Gilgamesh” bears a story of an uncivilized, savage semi-god, Enkidu, sent on the Earth to rid the people from a ruthless king, Gilgamesh. Enkidu was a wild animal from all aspects. His strength was unmatched; equal to that of the Gods, unless he met a harlot named Shamhat. She seduced and attracted him, resulting in broken connection with the nature and loss of strength. He became a civilized man. In another saga, a man living alone in the natural setting, a Heaven, meets a woman. They commit a sin and face God’s anger, resulting in expulsion from the paradise; sounds familiar? Yes, this is the story of Adam and Eve. The Biblical version states that their sin was the stealth of a fruit from the “forbidden tree”, and God threw them down on the Earth. After that, man formed a civilization in the world. The scholars and Biblicists, when comparing these two incidents, find certain resemblances and various differences between them.

Similarities:

Creation and purpose Adam was made from wet soil, so was Enkidu. The purpose of their creation was to serve the God/s.

Before civilization Both Adam and Enkidu, before civilization, were wild. They had no sense of covering the body, thus wore no clothes and lived among the animals.

First companion and civilization Both were uncivilized and knew nothing about the human behavior unless encountered by a woman. Enkidu found the company of Shamhat, a harlot, while Adam met Eve, his very first companion. As a result, they got civilized.

Before the first mistake Adam enjoyed every blessing of the God, had the whole Eden as his home and could do everything there, except one thing, taking fruit from a “forbidden tree”. Enkidu, too, enjoyed the strength of a demigod, who never committed a sin before he met Shamhat.

The mistake The point which arouses curiosity is that what was the “forbidden tree”? The most probable answer to it would be sex. Many scholars have pointed it out that Adam and Eve never knew of sex, until they made the grave mistake. It is also stated in various versions of the Bible, that after committing the sin, their “differentiating organs” became prominent. See the connection?  In “Gilgamesh”, Shamhat is a temple prostitute, who is given the duty of “civilizing” Enkidu. Later, Enkidu curses her for bringing him to civilization. It is also believed that later, in order to prevent sex from becoming a common ritual in the society, it was declared a sin and prohibited in the Bible.

Differences:

The creators In the “Gilgamesh”, a goddess created Enkidu, while in “Bible” it is stated that God created Adam. 

The contrary beliefs In the Babylonian article, intercourse was not believed as an offense, though Gilgamesh’s oppression of sleeping with newly wed brides was a sin for the gods. While for Adam and Eve, their first sin, as assumed by the scholars, was sex, so it was forbidden for all.

Punishments Gilgamesh got an archenemy descended from the gods, because of his sins including forced sex, but Enkidu was not punished for being “civilized” by having intercourse with a harlot. Contrarily, Adam and Eve were banished from the Eden, forever.

Conclusion
Though both accounts seem similar, we can not say that any of these is completely true or false. These may have common origin or belong to totally variant sources. The real fact is yet to be unveiled.

B. Floods of the “Genesis” and the “Gilgamesh”; how similar, how different?

Who is not aware of the flood of the “Genesis”? Similar in many ways, different as well, the two ancient incidents have mystified most of the readers and scholars, raising doubts regarding the origin and factuality of the two. Following are the resemblances noted by various scholars in the two materials.
Reason for flood The Gods in both the legendary stories sent flood in the world in rage.
The floods were worldwide The flood occurred worldwide, taking along with it every living and non living being. Even the huge mountains were covered with water. 
The God/s warned the most pious and righteous man Utnapishtim, in the “Gilgamesh” was warned by the God Ea, and in the “Genesis”, Noah was given a straight caution about the coming flood by the God Yahweh.
Order to build an ark In “Gilgamesh”, Utnapishtim was ordered by the God Ea; and Noah in the “Genesis”, was told by the God Yahweh, about the only way of survival i.e. by building and staying in a huge ark.
Similar beings inhabited the ark A big similarity in the two incidents is the kind of people who boarded the ark. The God Ea in the “Gilgamesh” told Utnapishtim to take with him his family, some righteous people and pairs of species of all animals and birds on the land. Similarly, Noah was given orders by the God Yahweh to take his family and a pair of each variety of birds and animals on the ark
A great rain/flood covered the earth In the “Gilgamesh”, a terrifying flood came, enveloping the whole land, and drowning every being with it. In the “Genesis”, the flood was terribly disastrous too. It also took away everything with it, living or non-living. After the flood, every living being turned to clay.
Same anchoring region of the arks The arks ion both writings stopped at the mountains in the Middle East. In the “Genesis”, the ark stopped near Mount Ararat. While the boat in the “Gilgamesh” landed near the Mount Nimush ( also quoted as Nisir).
Release of birds In the “Gilgamesh”, the birds were released by Utnapishtim to check the vicinity of dry land; and in “Genesis”, Noah also released two birds, among which, the dove did not return the second time.
Sacrifice by the main character After getting off the ark, the hero of the epic thanked the Gods and showed his gratitude with a sacrificed animal. In the “Genesis”, Noah sacrificed one of every clean animal and bird to please the God Yahweh. In the “Gilgamesh” epic, Utnapishtim sacrificed a sheep, offering it to the Gods with wine.
The heroes were blessed Utnapishtim in the “Gilgamesh” was blessed by the Gods, and the God Enlil granted him and his wife with immortality. Moreover, the Gods told Utnapishtim to repopulate the earth. For this, 14 other humans were also sent. In the “Genesis”, Noah and his wife” were blessed by the God and was ordered to give birth to more humans on the Earth.
Repentance of the God/s The God/s felt repentance on their uncontrolled wrath; Noah’s God, Yahweh, though never showed any regret but promised never to send such a calamity again, and Utnapishtim’s Gods cried and apologized for the devastation they had caused. (“Mistress of the Gods wailed: The olden days have alas turned to clay, because I said evil things in the Assembly of the Gods! How could I say evil things in the Assembly of the Gods, ordering a catastrophe to destroy my people?” Gilgamesh Tablet XI).

The writings also have minute differences
. They are given as under:

Varying reasons for God/s’ wrath: In the epic of “Gilgamesh”, the humans annoy the Gods with their intolerable ruckus. So they choose unanimously to get rid of all the messy mankind at once. On the other hand, the humans in “Noah’s Genesis” enrage the God because of their immoral deeds. So the God Yahweh (or Jehovah) decides to exterminate the sinful mankind from the world.
Mode of warning The “Gilgamesh” hero Utnapishtim, received a warning about the flood from the God Ea through dreams; while in the “Genesis” Noah received a direct revelation from the God Yahweh. Noah warned his neighborhood, while Utnapishtim was told to tell lie to the city folks.
Time taken to build the ark Noah’s ark was built in 100 years, while Utnapishtim’s ark was constructed in 7 days.
Different aspects of the ark Noah's ark was just 3 stories high and rectangular in shape, as recorded in the “Genesis”. Two estimated dimensions are 547 x 91 ft. and 450 x 75 ft. The Babylonian ark, according to the “Gilgamesh”, was 6 stories high and square. The Gilgamesh boat was an unseaworthy cube with a slate roof. In contrast, Noah’s ark had dimensions that were ideal for a seaworthy ship.
Additional people in Babylonian ark Utnapishtim invited additional people on the ark: a pilot and some skilled workmen, along with his own family, but Noah took only his family by the orders of the God.
Different landing points of the arks Though both the arks, as per quoted in their respective stories, landed in the Middle East, but their mountains vary. Noah's ark landed on Mt. Ararat; Utnapishtim's on Mt. Nimush; these are in the same region, but located few hundred miles apart.
Type of flood In the “Gilgamesh”, the flood was caused by heavy rain. On the contrary, the “Genesis” mentions heavy rain with ocean water emerging outward in the form of flood. 
Duration of the calamity The “Genesis” states that the flood lasted for forty days. But the “Gilgamesh” points out that the flood lasted for six days.
Different birds There is also a small difference noted regarding the birds released by the heroes of the accounts. Noah released a raven once and a dove twice, the dove did not return when sent for the second time; while Utnapishtim released three birds: a dove, a swallow and a raven. It was the raven that did not return.
Ways of being blessed Noah and Utnapishtim both showed proper reverence to the gods and were rewarded. The Gilgamesh epic says that the Utnapishtim was blessed with immortality, while Noah was not made immortal.

Conclusion

Religions and cultures are formed, reformed, adopted and revived with time. The similarities or difference between the two legends, the “Gilgamesh” and the “Genesis”, do not, thus, depict flaws in any of them, nor is this the reason for their comparison. Frank Lorey, an author at the Institute for Creation Research, wrote: "The Epic of Gilgamesh, then, contains the corrupted account as preserved and embellished by peoples who did not follow the God of the Hebrews." The comparative studies are made just for the sake of enhancement of knowledge and broadening of viewpoints. As for the stories, no one knows the complete truth, but He, the Ultimate Almighty.

Namra Nasir

Information for blood donators


Friday, 15 March 2013

Today's greatest fear...or greatest tool??

Media , traditional as well as social...is being merciful as it has OPENED our eyes...it has brought the awareness that we lacked...it has brought up SOCIAL ACTIVISM...it has brought revolutions...it has promoted freedom..and ensured provision of rights...it is the tool against oppression, atrocities and believed to be a SOLUTION  to many social problems...

Media has given voice to the unheard...eyes to the blinded ones and turned the world into a cyber-global-social village...it has united the scattered nations and compelled people to raise their voices against injustice...

But...it is not all goody goody about media...

...emm...is it all that it is??or is there some other side of the picture too???
well...media is showing what the AGENCIES want itto show...there wasa time when media was not free to express or publicize anything without the permission of the country's government...BUT NOW...the media is SO CALLED free...yet it is nothing but merely a puppet in the hands of the SUPER POWERS....the media now shows what IT WANTS US to see...the good is shown as bad...the bad is shown as WORST and the worst are promoted as the BEST!!  death of 200 is shown as 20...and a protest conisting of 200 people is depicted as of 2000...(yes we have seen that in the cases of drone attacks and local political public sermons) so it is no more helpful in correct opinion formation...today the traditional media is focussing more on the spicy gossip part rather than revelaing the truth...

The essay that won me FIRST PRIZE ON NATIONAL LEVEL i.e. all over PAKISTAN by MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD...On 30TH DECEMBER 2009...:)


ROLE  OF  YOUTH  IN  PROMOTION  OF  CIVIC  SPIRIT  AND  COURTESY
Hearts like doors will open with ease,                                                               
to very very little keys; 
and don’t forget that two of these                                                              
Are ‘thank you sir’ and ‘if you please
        

  How beautiful will it be, if this world becomes peaceful? There are no news of chaos, crimes, losses, accidents and disappointments. The atmosphere is filled with joy, affection and love. Every person has a smile on his face. Everyone is a perfect example of courteousness and humanity… Alas! This is not the world we are living in. This is not the world that God created for the “Crown of Creations”. It is a place full of hatred, impatience, anger, crime, enmity, selfishness, betrayal, insincerity, arrogance and every other evil one can think of.
        We often see our elders talking about courtesy and civic sense. Have we ever thought that what does this mean? The word “courtesy” is similar to a building, constructed with several different bricks of civility, politeness, love, civilization, grace, respect, refined manners, patience, tolerance, sincerity, piousness, good intentions and so on. The word “Insaan”, (ﺍﻨﺴﺎﻦ) itself means love, affection and goodness. Courtesy is the base of Islamic ideology. It means “putting up with others”, which enables different races and classes to settle down together. Courtesy and civility are the teachings of every religion and every prophet. Even the great prophets were ordered to act upon the principles of courtesy so that their followers do the same. Quran says that,

“God loves those who have patience and tolerance.”

 It is stated in Quran that Prophet Mosses was again and again warned by God for his harsh behavior. Similarly God commanded Prophet Jacob to have patience and not to cry for his lost son (Prophet Yusuf). Jesus Christ’s teachings are a great example of courtesy and graciousness. Prophet Ayub is best known for his patience and fortitude.
 Holy Prophet Mohammad (P.B.U.H.) is the best practical example of courtesy and civility. His forbearance and forgiveness made him the greatest reformer of the world. His politeness and tolerance have no equivalence in the entire world. He (P.B.U.H.) was kind even to his most bitter enemies. He (P.B.U.H.) disliked arrogance and rigidness. He (P.B.U.H.) was amiable with animals too. His principle was to be “Polite but firm”. That is why he conquered the savage and uncivilized Arabs; and then the whole mankind.
Today the world has become quite advanced, but the fact that courteousness, tolerance and refined manners are the key to achieve any goal, still stands firm. The people who accepted this fact and stood by it, got success; there is an Urdu saying,  
              

   ﺒﮯﺍﺪﺐ ﺑﮯﻨﺼﻳﺐ ﺒﺎﺍﺪﺐ ﺑﺎﻨﺼﻴﺐ                                                                                                
  (Baa-adab baa-naseeb; Bay-adab bay-naseeb)


 Whether it was Aristotle, Socrates, Alexander, Mohammad Ali Jinnah, Allama Iqbal, Mahatma Gandhi, Churchill, Queen Elizabeth, George Washington or any great personality; we find courtesy and civility as common characters in all of them.
         Few days ago, I read an essay, “On saying please”. In this essay the writer has explained the significance of civility. The theme of the essay is that our harsh and rude behavior can hurt others’ feelings and consequently be harmful for us. On the other hand, if we have pleasing manners, they can be beneficial for both.                                                             
Civic spirit and courteousness are symbols of a civilized nation. For human civilization it is must to be chivalrous and for that, we have to be tolerant. Courtesy opens the door of cordial relations among all the members of the society. The words like ‘kindly’, ‘please’ and ‘thank you’ curb the class difference among the people. It makes our lives smoother and sweeter.
Courtesy and discourtesy both are infectious. It is a chain, which binds everyone in a circle. Being rude, rough and impolite spreads anger and irritation in a society. If we encounter incivility in life, most of us become uncouth, causing harm to the society. Our bad manners poison our general life more than any other crime. Discourtesy injures the souls and one’s self respect. An injured body can recover very soon, but the wound of an injured soul never heals and is usually unforgettable. It is observed that if a boss loses his temper and insults his subordinate, the subordinate will affront the peon. The peon will scold his wife and the wife will be angry at her children. The weakest always becomes a sufferer. On the other hand, courtesy can make a day much brighter. If your day begins with a pleasant mood, then that would certainly affect your surroundings in a nice way. Thus good civic sense and courtesy give birth to a chain of smiles and politeness.
 Youth plays the most effective role in prosperity or downfall of a nation. Today, if we talk about the youth, the image that comes to our minds is “pathetic”. Why is it so? It is because of their present condition. The youth of the 21st century may have become modern and quite realistic, but this is also an undeniable fact that they have forgotten their ethical and moral values. They have been detracted!
There used to be a time when the youth paid due respect to their elders. The orders or recommendations of their elders meant a lot to them. They could not even think of disobeying or showing arrogance to them. Their elders’ decisions were considered final. The youngsters offered their seats to the older people. Women were greatly honored and respected. The children used to run to their parents on their first call. They never spoke in a high tone in front of their elders. Youngsters never went out of home without their parents’ permission. Children entrusted their parents and shared their problems. People were quite tolerant and generally forgave each other. Education and knowledge were acquired to refine the moral and ethical values. All this was termed as “courtesy”. Let me remind the readers that I am talking about the youth only 3 decades earlier.
Things changed as the time passed, and so did the definition of “courtesy”. Now, in 2008, 60% of the youth has made its “own” ethical codes of life. According to today’s youth, the practice of courteous manners is a symbol of backwardness and narrow mindedness. The elderly people are given very little or no respect. Their suggestions and advices are taken as “interference in the personal matters” of the youngsters. The young ones are often seen arguing with their elders. The ideas of the experienced generation are known as old fashioned and are usually laughed at. Disobedience has become a fashion amongst the youth of today and those obeying their elders are mocked at. Young people want to keep their all activities secret. If checked, they become rebellions and get more attracted towards the bad company. In this way, instead of doing some positive work, most of them are getting involved in different types of crimes. Today’s active and energetic youth finds it hard to spare time for their parents, and even harder to help them. Women are given the status equal to men, well, that is a great advancement; but at the same time they are disrespected. The youngsters can hear songs for hours and hours but do not have the patience to listen to any good advice. Thus, the youth, just to be modern and fashionable, has forgotten all the moral values and left behind the civic spirit.
Have we ever pondered upon the point that who is responsible for such a miserable condition of today’s youth? If we do, then we will understand that it is not only the youth to be blamed. As a matter of fact, the youth is an inexperienced generation which follows the path of the experienced people around it. I briefly introduce here the generation whom our youth is following.
Today, people are divided into different groups on the basis of their religious beliefs and politics. On the religious level, the people are divided into various sects and sub-sects. Every sub-sect has its own mosque and institutions. In those institutions, the people are not taught how to live a life according to their religion; instead, they are poisoned against the people of other sects and in this way innocent people become enemies for no reason. The political leaders do not tolerate each other. They abuse and dishonor one another in the assemblies. Common people fight on petite issues. When everyone is derailed from the chivalrous path, how can we expect the youth to be civilized? In such a condition the downfall of a state becomes inexorable. All this shows that we are in a great need to revise the lesson of courteous behavior and civic spirit. Some people think that tolerance and nice behavior means weakness, but in fact, it is the courteousness and self control which makes a person strong.
Our youth must prepare itself for the challenges of future. Right now, it is in a state of confusion due to political uncertainty and growing financial problems. Strong determination and patience is required to put the youth back on track. Our youth should show the best of its character in every field of life. It should try to forgive others and move ahead. Youth is the age when we feel like having the power of hooking the world on a small jack. We have high ambitions, courage and strong determinations to accept the challenges and face the difficulties. We should improve our own behavior. We should make ourselves wise enough to smile even in the darkest hour of life because    
    
                                   “Smiles are passports through the desert.”                                          

Now the question arises that how can we bring change in the human behavior? This is quite obvious that it can be done by practice of courtesy. That is the only way to change the immature thinking of the inexperienced youth. Young people are always more creative and energetic. A great liability of future construction lies on the shoulders of youth. They are the future commanders and leaders. They are the trend makers. So to begin with, we can start the practice of courtesy and civic spirit from ourselves and, as I mentioned earlier, it will be automatically transferred to the whole society. We must first differentiate between right and wrong and convey it to the youth in a polite manner. Here are a few suggestions for today’s youth:

§  Clear your thoughts and make your minds sound.
§  Set the goals and move towards them with firm determination and consistency.
§  Make best use of your talent, time and energy instead of wasting your life in unnecessary deeds.
§  Manage your time.
§ Consult the experienced people for the problems because there is no short cut to experience.
§  Try to find the solution of any problem with peaceful mind.
§  Listen to the advice of your adults and act upon them (not blindly, but with wisdom).
If the youth follows the above mentioned rules, I am sure that it will become civilized and courteous soon (Insha’Allah), because

“It takes very little effort, to make a big difference.”

So our youth needs to put some effort to change itself, and its surroundings. I know that one man cannot change the whole world, but I believe that like the Prophet Mohammad (P.B.U.H.) or Gautama Buddha,

“The light developed in one person can dispel the darkness in many others.”

I would like to end my essay with this verse

                                          ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻦ  ﺒﻧﻧﺎ ﻔﺮﺸﺗﮯ   ﺴﮯ  ﺒﮩﺗﺮ ﮨﮯ                                                                                            
                                          ﻤﮕﺭﺍﺲ ﻤﻴﮟ ﭘﮍﺗﻰ ﮨﮯ ﻤﺣﻧﺖ ﺰﻴﺎﺩﮦ


(Farishtay se behter he Insaan banna                                                                 
Magar is me parti he mehnat ziyada)                            
       
 (It is better to be a good human being than an angel, 
but it requires more efforts.)

                                                                                                                           


  Written by:                                                                                                        
  Namra Nasir                                                                                                             Student of F.Sc.1st year                                                                                                          27/03/09                                   

Kashmir Issue


Kashmir Issue and Role of Pakistan

The Kashmir conflict was highlighted at the time of partition of subcontinent into India and Pakistan in 1947. Both the countries have made claims to Kashmir, based on historical developments and religious affiliations of Kashmir and Kashmiri people. State of Jammu and Kashmir lies strategically in the north-west of the sub-continent, bordering China and former Soviet Union.

Historical Background
In the 18th century, Kashmir was ruled by the Muslim Pashtun Durrani Empire. In 1819 Kashmir was conquered by the Sikh ruler Ranjit Singh. Following the First Anglo-Sikh War in 1845-1846 Kashmir was first ceded by the ‘Treaty of Lahore’ to the East India Company, and shortly after it was sold by the ‘Treaty of Amritsar’ to Maharaja Gulaab Singh. From then until the Partition of India in 1947, Kashmir was ruled by the Hindu Maharajas although the majority of the population was Muslim.
Independence movement in sub-continent also created some awareness in Kashmir and as a result in 1932 a state political party under the name of Muslim Conference was founded. It was lead by Sheikh Abdullah. In 1939 the name of this party was changed to All Jammu and Kashmir National Conference. The main objective of this party was to create awareness against the cruelties of Maharaja and the rights of Muslim Kashmiris. Afterwards Sheikh Abdullah started spreading secular ideas. First he favored Kashmir to join India, later on he demanded an independent Kashmir .On 17th June 1944 Quaid-e-Azam in his speech said “As congress is cheating the minorities in India same way National Conference is working on the same lines in Kashmir.” He declared Kashmir as the ‘life-line’ (Shah-rug) of Pakistan. On 19th July 1947 a meeting was held in Srinagar where Muslim Conference passed a resolution to join Pakistan
At the time of partition there were 562 princely states. As per partition plan of 3rd June, these states were given the option to join India or Pakistan keeping in view the principle of partition i.e. majority of population and geographical contiguity..
Accession issue of almost all the states was decided one way or the other well before partition i.e. 14th August 1947. However dispute arose about three states namely Junagarh, Hyderabad and Kashmir.
Hyderabad state decided to remain independent while Junagarh state decided to join Pakistan. Both these states were ruled by Muslim rulers but had Hindu majority population. India rejected the decision of state rulers on the grounds that these two states have Hindu majority and were not contiguous to Pakistan. India forcibly occupied Junagarh in Oct 1947 and attacked on Hyderabad. India occupied it on 18th September 1948.
As regards Kashmir, India took a somersault and accepted the request of Hindu Raja Hari Sigh to join India against the wishes of Kashmiri Muslim majority and violated the principle of partition.
Under a planned and a convert deal, boundary commission headed by Radcliffe, on 17th August 1947 unjustly awarded Gurdaspur and Pathankot to India with a view to provide India a land access into Kashmir..
India started providing full support to the Raja in his mission of driving out Muslims from Kashmir. In October 1947 volunteers from Pakistan’s tribal area and Lashkars from NWFP entered through Deer to support the people of Kashmir and liberate it from Dogra rule. Fighting commenced between the Dogra Army and Freedom Fighters. As a result Dogra Army suffered heavy reverses and withdrew to Srinagar.
Violating the partition plan India inducted troops into Kashmir and occupied Srinagar. Freedom fighters started with-drawing under the pressure of regular Indian Army and the borders of Pakistan were threatened. On 20th April 1948 Pakistan also moved its troops into Kashmir and Kashmir war 1948 started. As a result some area was liberated from Indian occupation which is now known as Azad Kashmir.
At this juncture India knocked the door of UN. United Nations Security Council Commission for India and Pakistan passed a resolution for immediate ceasefire, declared Kashmir as a disputed territory and said that its future will be decided by a free, fair and impartial plebiscite under UN. After some time India established a rubber stamp assembly through a drama election in Kashmir and started calling Kashmir as an ‘integral part of India’. Due to India’s rigid attitude Pakistan knocked the door of UN on 2nd June 1957 and drew the attention of the world body to Indian fraud. Since then UN sent number of missions to negotiate with India but all in vain.
India went to war with China in 1962 and suffered a humiliating defeat. On the pretext of threat from China India got maximum economic and military aid from USA and USSR. Pakistan did not intervene in the Sino Indian war. India promised with Pakistan that after this war it will settle the Kashmir issue with Pakistan. This promise was never fulfilled as usual.
During 1965 and 1971 Indo Pak Wars, India continued to raise the China bogey to get sympathies from US but deployed her troops against Pakistan and in 1999 Kargil war started. Fearing that it will turn into a nuclear war President of USA Mr. Bill Clinton pressurized Pakistan to retreat.  Gradually many other voluntary groups got involved in Kashmir freedom fight.   

Main Disputes

Map Issue
As with disputed territories, each government issues map depicting their claims in Kashmir territory. The Government of Pakistan maintains un-provisionally and unconditionally that the informal accession of Jammu and Kashmir to Pakistan or India remains to be decided by UN plebiscite. Pakistan accepts the UN’s map of the territory.



Water Dispute
Kashmir is the origin point for many rivers and tributaries of the Indus River basin. They include Jhelum and Chenab rivers which primarily flow into Pakistan while other branches the Ravi, Beas and Sutlej irrigate northern India. In dire need India may withhold the water-flow and thus choke the agrarian economy of Pakistan. Indus Water Treaty signed in 1960 resolved this issue to some extent but some concerns are pointed out by Pakistan over the construction of dams on the Indian side which limit the water flow to  Pakistani side.

Pakistan’s View and Role in Kashmir Conflict

·        Maharaja Hari Singh used brutal force to suppress Kashmiris
·        Maharaja being Hindu, held no authority to determine Kashmir’s future
·        Indian forces stepped in Kashmir before Pakistan  
·         More than 1.5 million Kashmiris have been made homeless from Indian held Kashmir
·        Pakistan is not supplying any arms, ammunition or training to the militants engaged in reckless killings and mayhem in the name of religion
·        Pakistan gives only moral, ethical and military support to Muslims of Kashmir
·        Pakistan has repeatedly claimed that by constructing a fence along the line of control India is violating the Simla Accord.
·        Pakistan has promised to check infiltration in Jammu and Kashmir
·        Pakistan points towards reports from the United Nations which condemns India for its human rights violations against Kashmiri people. HRO have strongly condemned Indian troops for widespread rape and murder of innocent civilians accusing falsely for being militants
Conclusion
As Kashmir is nuclear flash point in the sub-continent, so for the sake of the peace of the world, this dispute has to be settled according to the will of Kashmiris’ religious and strategic ground realities and natural affiliations of this heaven on earth.
Kashmir for Pakistan is not only the piece of land or origin of rivers but a part of our religion. We are supporting and fighting for Kashmir on the same principles as we fought for Pakistan. Kashmiri people, Islamic cause, Nuclear power, Kashmir and Chinese friendship are the four pillars of our strength and unity

Namra Nasir